Bush approves surveillance bill - Offtopic Forum

Offtopic Forum

Banner 12


Notices

Bush approves surveillance bill

This is a discussion on Bush approves surveillance bill within the On Topics forums, part of the On Topics category; Bush approves surveillance bill George W Bush signs into law the bill granting telephone companies immunity President Bush said the ...

Reply
Old 07-10-2008, 08:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
Points: 233, Level: 4 Points: 233, Level: 4 Points: 233, Level: 4
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 Sapient's Avatar
 
Sapient has no status.
Status: Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Default Bush approves surveillance bill

Quote:
Bush approves surveillance bill
George W Bush signs into law the bill granting telephone companies immunity
President Bush said the new law "will play a critical role"

US President George W Bush has approved a bill to shield telephone companies who helped in the White House's controversial wiretaps programme.

The bill also grants the US government the power to continue with the telephone surveillance scheme.

The White House faced criticism when it emerged it was monitoring - without warrants - communications in the US involving one participant abroad.

The bill had previously been passed by both houses of Congress.

'Respecting liberties'

Signing the bill into law, President Bush said it "will play a critical role in helping to prevent another attack on our soil".

"The bill will allow our intelligence professionals to quickly and effectively monitor the communications of terrorists abroad while respecting the liberties of Americans here at home," he added.

Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama voted in favour of the measure when it came before the Senate on Wednesday.

His decision to back the bill drew criticism from some of his supporters, who pointed to past statements in which Mr Obama had pledged to block any bill which granted immunity to telecommunication companies.


Man speaking on mobile phone

Q&A: US surveillance row

"I wouldn't have drafted the legislation like this," said Mr Obama, in a statement on his website.

However, he added, "in a dangerous world, government must have the authority to collect the intelligence we need to protect the American people".

The bill was passed in the House of Representatives with bipartisan support last month, after House Democrats reached a compromise with Republicans over the provisions to grant telecommunications companies immunity from prosecution.

Telephone companies were facing as many as 40 lawsuits for their involvement in the scheme.

Previous attempts to pass the bill - and allow the warrantless wiretap scheme to continue - had foundered on the issue of immunity for telecom firms.

Democrats had been reluctant to grant the firms immunity, saying the courts should first determine what the companies did.

President Bush - backed by Republicans in Congress - wanted to ensure that firms which had helped his administration would not be liable for prosecution.

The two sides reached a compromise, whereby telephone companies would not be automatically immune, but courts would be obliged to dismiss a suit against a firm if it was able to produce written certification that the White House had asked it to participate in the programme and had assured the firm it was legal.
Source: BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush approves surveillance bill

Talk about an erosion of rights. The NSA say they monitor one million eletronic messages every day, but to see a so-called democratic government introduce legislation like this is a crime. And no doubt, some Americans will their lil' heads up and down and claim that their government are protecting them. The same government that's been raping and murdering them. heh

Gotta love the irony.
Sapient is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 09:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
Points: 312, Level: 6 Points: 312, Level: 6 Points: 312, Level: 6
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 BrendaMarie's Avatar
 
BrendaMarie has no status.
Status: Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 108
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Default

I agree with you. So much for living in a democracy as we no longer have the true freedom of speech, which, after all, a democracy really is all about.
BrendaMarie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Error. Page cannot be displayed. Please contact your service provider for more details. (7)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7


Nav Item BG